The Liberal Democrats have today launched our manifesto for the forthcoming Cambridgeshire County Council and mayoral elections.
On the 14th March the Cambridge City Joint Area Committee (CJAC), composed of county and city Labour and Lib Dem councillors, approved the County Council’s Parking Plan for this area. This is the final stage of the process before implementation. At present the timetable is not fixed, but installation is expected within the next few months.
I want to thank everyone for their input into this difficult exercise. There is no perfect solution, but the plan drawn up by the council’s Parking Policy Manager should improve the parking situation for most residents. The council survey conducted in November last year showed 59% in favour, with 35% against. This favourable vote followed a similar result in the informal survey I ran about a year earlier.
I know many of you opposed the plan for a variety of reasons. All objections and suggestions were put before the CJAC in summary form, with commentary. One common issue raised was the question of whether there had been sufficient consultation. You may find it helpful to see this summary of the information and consultation process that has taken place over the last 18 months:
- November 2015 An unofficial survey by me, to local residents. This showed strong support for residents’ parking in principle (62% For, 30% Against)
- February 2016 Information meeting at St John’s Church. It was chaired by me, with the Cambridge Parking Policy Manager present. It had a good mixture of people for and against a residents’ parking scheme
- November 2016 The formal council parking plan was delivered to every household in the area, with an invitation to express support or opposition.
- The parking plan, with information about how residents’ parking works, was on display at Rock Road Library
- January 2017 The result of the formal survey was announced, showing a substantial vote in favour of the residents’ parking plan (59% for, 35% against)
- January 2017 The formal council letter advertising the Traffic Regulation Orders (TRO) was delivered to every household, posted in the street, and advertised in the local press. People were invited to put forward material objections to the plan.
- There has been publicity in the Queen Edith’s Community News, the Lib Dem Focus newsletter, and in local newspapers.
- The parking situation was covered on BBC Radio Cambridgeshire and in ITV’s Parking Wars.
- Four leaflets have been circulated by local residents, two for and two against the plan.
- On top of all this I have personally dealt with a few hundred emails sent to me about residents’ parking.
The Council invited residents to put their names forward, if they wished to speak at the 14 March committee meeting. Three residents did so: two for and one against.
Two other principal areas of concern were raised in the TRO process: pavement parking in Marshall Road and whether the plan provided sufficient residents’ parking bays. Here is how the Council responded:
Why is pavement/footway parking not being considered, when it is permitted in other parts of the city such as Romsey?
Cambridgeshire County Council is proposing that pavement parking is only considered in exceptional circumstances where there is no impact on safety or pedestrian movement and where the underlying construction is suitable for vehicle parking. Parking on pavements:
- Creates a hazard for the visually impaired, disabled and elderly people and those with prams and pushchairs
- Creates safety issues for pedestrians and can hide other vehicles particularly on bends, narrow roads
and at junctions.
- Can cause damage to the footway.
As the proposed scheme reduces the overall parking spaces available particularly in Marshall Road, will there be sufficient space for residents and visitors?
Parking in Marshall Road, in its current form, is unsustainable and could represent hazards to all road users not only now but in the future. In order to regulate parking effectively for the benefit of all highway users it will be necessary to make changes which will ultimately limit and reduce overall car parking on the street. Whilst this is regrettable, the safety of all highway users should take primacy over the availability of car parking spaces.
Looking at the plans, the following parking spaces are available (based on average vehicle length of 5m)
Marshall Road 39
Hartington Grove 108
Blinco Grove 100
Magnolia Close 7
Rock Road 28
Rathmore Road 67
Rathmore Close 4
A recent parking survey was carried out across Cambridge by a company called Mott MacDonald. This survey showed 291 spaces (in Rock Road, Blinco Grove, Hartington Grove, Marshall Road and Rathmore Road) were occupied by residents (the count was completed at 5.30am, a time when the number of commuters would be negligible and the number of residents would be at their maximum). This indicates that there would be space available for all resident permit holders even with the number of spaces reduced as a result of the introduction of public safety, access and junction protection.
I hope this helps answer some of the main objections raised. As you can see, even with Marshall Road no longer able to park on the pavement the council’s’figures above show that with the plan there is a clear number of extra spaces available for residents and visitors: 353 – 291 = 62.
The Parking Policy Manager’s report to the CJAC is 31 pages long. It can be viewed on line on the County Council’s website.
On Thursday 16th March, Cambridgeshire County Council’s Planning Committee passed plans for the developments at Morley Memorial Primary School.
The developments will bring the entire school onto a single site, and create three new classrooms, as well as make improvements to toilets, windows and the boiler, which will save the school money on maintenance. The details of the plans and the council report can be read here.
Local residents and Morley parents, staff and governors attended the meeting to listen to and participate in the debate. So did a prospective Morley pupil, a delightful gurgly baby called Hannah, whose presence reminded us what it’s all about.
Pamela McLeman and Mary O’Flynn, a former school caretaker, articulated concerns about loss of open space, and parking and traffic.
The Head, Nikki Brown, spoke of why the changes are needed and how they would improve the day-to-day logistics of school life as well as cater properly for pupils and staff with disabilities – and make all the children feel part of the school.
I spoke in support of the application, while recognizing the tension between traffic and the educational needs. You can read my speech here: Morley planning application
Councillors were impressed with the plans, praising the way the architectural design of the new build would blend with the old buildings, and showing an appreciation of how the school has balanced the need for play space. There was an understanding of the traffic and parking problems but an acceptance that parking is a problem at all schools, and that it was not of sufficient weight to stand in the way of the school’s improvements.
Construction traffic and pedestrians and cyclists do not mix, especially for young children and I asked if the condition on delivery hours could be amended to be well clear of school finishing time. I am pleased that this was taken up. Deliveries will now have to be completed by 2.45pm in termtime.
Contractors will be encouraged to use Park & Ride, as there will be no parking on Blinco Grove except for the school car park.
A residents’ parking scheme for the north of Queen Edith’s has been approved by the councils’* traffic committee.
The Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) for the parking scheme was advertised to local residents and in the local paper, following majority support by residents in the Morley area for the County Council’s proposals when consulted last year. The council consultation followed my survey to establish in principle support for residents’ parking, and after a public meeting and display at the library.
Residents from the area attended the meeting and spoke both in favour of and in opposition to the proposals. The vote was 10 votes in favour, 2 against.
The scheme will cover the area from the Leisure Park to Blinco Grove, including both main roads.
Also yesterday, a new residents’ parking policy was passed by the County Council’s Highways Committee.
*Joint committee comprising councillors from Cambridge City and Cambridgeshire County Council.
The first phase of the County Council’s new cycleway on Hills Road has had a big impact.
The County tells us it has increased cycling numbers since 2013, and it certainly makes for a smoother ride, especially on the southbound side of the road. It’s changed the landscape of Hills Road. And it’s given us new bus stops.
BUT: the cycleway has generated hundreds of emails, letters and phone calls, due not just to the new road layout but to the sheer length of time it’s taken – or more correctly it is taking. Two years on, it is still not completely finished, with the pink tarmac petering out at Holbrook Road, and a sedum strip that patently has not flourished. Residents have told me of many other examples of unfinished work.
Traffic management during construction was poor, ironically often putting cyclists and pedestrians at risk.
Was it worth it?
After a lot of effort, we have persuaded the County Council to undertake a review of the cycleway so that lessons can be learnt about what went well and what didn’t go so well. Although the next stretch of Hills Road going up to Addenbrooke’s is already scheduled, we have asked that the findings of the review be incorporated during the works as they emerge. They will also inform future projects.
I am on a working party which will be looking at different types of evidence including the user experience, travel statistics and accident records. We would like to invite you to take part in an online survey and we are looking for views from all road users — that includes the experience of residents.
We want to know about your experience of the cycleway if you use it as a cyclist, and also about its impact on you if you don’t cycle, ie if you walk, take the bus, or drive.
Here is a link to the survey: http://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/hillsroadcycleway/
The County Council has published the formal Traffic Regulation Order for the residents’ parking scheme in the Morley area (from the Cherry Hinton Road/ Hills Road junction down to Blinco Grove).
People wishing to comment on the traffic regulation order for the residents’ parking scheme should visit http://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/MorleyResidentsParkingScheme and either use the link there or email [email protected].
They can also write to Policy and Regulation Team, Box No. SH1204, Shire Hall, Castle Hill, Cambridge, CB3 0AP quoting PR346.
Comments are invited up till Friday 17th February. The order will be determined by the Cambridge Area Joint Traffic Committee on 13th March.
County Council officers claim there are ‘many good reasons’ why they need to close Hills Road to enable construction of new cycleways. It is set to be a 24-7 closure, starting in May and lasting for five months. I can see many reasons why this is a bad idea and have grave concerns about access to the hospital (especially the Rosie Maternity Hospital and A&E), the impact on students sitting exams, and the knock-on effect on smaller, neighbouring roads. I have put seven questions to the County Council:
1. What studies have been done of the impact on neighbouring roads?
2. What contact has there been with schools and colleges in the area, and what has their response been?
3. What has the response been from Addenbrooke’s A&E Department, the Rosie Maternity Hospital and the ambulance service?
4. As the closure is proposed to begin in May, what contact has there been with the City Council elections department as to how this might affect people going to vote in local elections?
5. What assessment was done of alternative options such as a non-peak closure?
6. What arrangements are proposed for non-vehicular traffic?
7. How will residents access their homes?
I await their response. Meanwhile, if you have additional questions, please keep them coming.
Also, visit the exhibition on Thursday where the plans will be on display:
Thursday 26th January 17.30 – 19.30 St John the Evangelist Church, Hills Road.
The County Council intends to improve our primary school on Blinco Grove (dates from the 19th century) and to create a day nursery in the Early Years building on the corner of Baldock Way and Blinco Grove.
The planning application was to have been decided this month, but has been halted to allow more work on the transport statement. Unfortunately it contained serious inaccuracies, including a questionable claim about ‘sufficient unrestricted on-street parking available on the roads surrounding the school’. I wonder when they came?
The application is now intended to be determined on 16th February. If you haven’t seen the plans yet you can view them here. If you have commented, you should get a letter from the Council explaining what to do if you wish to speak at the meeting.
The County Council runs a Local Highways Improvement Programme to fund small improvements to the public highway. Residents and groups can submit bids every autumn for projects of up to £10,000.The bids have to describe a local problem and propose a solution that can deliver lasting benefit, which has community support. Road safety is an important recurring theme. The bids are scored by councillors every January and the highest scoring ones are funded for the next financial year.
Working with residents in various streets, have put in bids for parking restrictions in Godwin Way, Beaumont Road, Topcliffe Way, Cavendish Avenue, Netherhall Way and Chalk Grove. A Queen Edith’s Way resident has put in a bid to address speeding problems.
Our bids will be scored on 23rd January — wish us luck!
Here is the report on the consultation on residents’ parking, by County Council Parking Manager Nicola Gardner: https://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/site/custom_scripts/cons_details.aspx?ref=540.